51stcenturyfox: (Default)
[personal profile] 51stcenturyfox
Following today's fandom!secret on this topic, some questions about... foreskins!



Here's the secret someone posted:




Do they have a point? I was going to do a poll, but LJ is being very naughty about polls.

What are your thoughts? Should fic writers mention foreskins more often (for characters who are likely to be uncut?)  Do you not need or want this detail? Do you assume they're there anyway, depending on how you imagine the characters and who they are? Is this something you've never really considered, either way? 

Do you not give a hot damn?

ELVES?  VAMPIRES?  HOBBITS??? I don't even know.

Are you pretty sure Jack Harkness has a fiveskin? Because I am.

ETA: Thank you to my f-list (unlike the F!S thread) for not being judgey about people's parts. Every cock is pretty!

(no subject)

Date: 2010-02-05 08:13 am (UTC)
ext_367923: (Default)
From: [identity profile] easilymused1956.livejournal.com
This is fascinating. I think the only time I've mentioned foreskin was in a foreplay context.

Lord, this all reminds me of the 'Was Methos Circumcised' debate in Highlander.

On a personal note, the ex was born in '59 and was cut. Both my brother, born in the 60s were too.

Foreskins are FUN to play with. And uncut peens are usually a lot more sensitive. Yeah. Fun.

Renee



(no subject)

Date: 2010-02-05 02:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 51stcenturyfox.livejournal.com
EVERY FANDOM MUST HAVE THIS DEBATE, apparently. :)

Yup, I know exactly what you mean.

Profile

51stcenturyfox: (Default)
51stcenturyfox

May 2020

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags